http://www.depict.org/2015/bait/?category_request=2015
I chose this one because i thought it was funny and through cheating it ruins the fun for yourself and others. I also enjoy fishing so by seeing that the man tried to cheat by using dynamite he was going to fail either way and he ruined the fishing trip for his friend because his rod broke at the end. It just shows that by cheating you're not going to come far. it was just one straight shot and it was just the animation that was moving in the film. This was my favorite one out of all the films and it was well done, good film.
http://www.depict.org/2013/cool-unicorn-bruv/?category_request=2013
I chose this one because it was funny. it was funny because the bloke with the bike was trying to sell the other guy the bike but because of the other person having a better ride he didn't want to buy it anymore. it was especially funny at the end when he was angry that he didn't buy the bike because of what he said at the end of the clip. the camera angle in the film changed a lot to show what happened in the film. It was good at the end because the unicorn blew a rainbow out of its horn showing them both that it could actually do magical things. It was good camera work from the people that filmed it and they knew what they were doing because it wasn't rough and it was a clean shoot. overall it was a good film.
http://www.depict.org/2014/loose-ends/?category_request=2014
I chose this one because it was funny and just plain weird. It was funny because the bloke who knew what was going on was getting annoyed at the other guy because he didn't know what was going on. Then right at the end a beam came up and a random naked man was there and got shot, it was a bit wacky and that made it funny. They knew what they were doing before they filmed this as it was a clean shoot, they knew what they were going to say so they probably didn't have to do a lot of extra work. The camera angles that they did were good and it was a good film, even though it was very strange.
Monday, 17 October 2016
Evaluation of the Blair witch project - Low budget
Blair witch low budget task - Evaluation
in the film you could tell that it was a low budget film because the cameras they were using were old and the picture was not very good. It was the first film that used the cameras in first person and it made millions compared to what they payed to make the film. You could also tell that it was a low budget film because the only videos that they took were either in black and white or a bad image. they meant to do it like this because it makes it look real, like it actually happened. Also the actors were young so they wouldn't have been payed a lot because they were not well known as well. They didn't have to pay for many props and lighting as they filmed it in the woods.
They used the same place over and over again so they did many recurring scenes. They didn't have to pay more many special effects. only the blood from the teeth in the bundle of stick towards the end of the film. For the film they would only have to pay the actors that played a part in the film, blocking of the woods so they could film it, paying for a car, feeding the actors, special effects and editing the film.
The location where they filmed were low budget. A good thing about making this film was that they set it in history so then other film makers decided to use the first person camera filming in new films. The props in the woods were hand made so they dint have to put much money into that part of the film and the rock formation that they used were also hand made so they didn't have to put much money into the film to make it good. You also don't get to see the witch in the film, you can only hear her in the film so they didn't have to pay for another actor in the film they would have just used noises and effects. The music that they used was low budget because it wasn't that great so that would be another factor of it being a low budget film.
in the film you could tell that it was a low budget film because the cameras they were using were old and the picture was not very good. It was the first film that used the cameras in first person and it made millions compared to what they payed to make the film. You could also tell that it was a low budget film because the only videos that they took were either in black and white or a bad image. they meant to do it like this because it makes it look real, like it actually happened. Also the actors were young so they wouldn't have been payed a lot because they were not well known as well. They didn't have to pay for many props and lighting as they filmed it in the woods.
They used the same place over and over again so they did many recurring scenes. They didn't have to pay more many special effects. only the blood from the teeth in the bundle of stick towards the end of the film. For the film they would only have to pay the actors that played a part in the film, blocking of the woods so they could film it, paying for a car, feeding the actors, special effects and editing the film.
The location where they filmed were low budget. A good thing about making this film was that they set it in history so then other film makers decided to use the first person camera filming in new films. The props in the woods were hand made so they dint have to put much money into that part of the film and the rock formation that they used were also hand made so they didn't have to put much money into the film to make it good. You also don't get to see the witch in the film, you can only hear her in the film so they didn't have to pay for another actor in the film they would have just used noises and effects. The music that they used was low budget because it wasn't that great so that would be another factor of it being a low budget film.
Friday, 14 October 2016
Induction task change of hands
This is our video and i think that it went well but we could have taken extra time to plan it and do it as we didn't do it to the full potential. The filming went good except from the last video the aperture when a it grainy so we need to use the cameras more so we know what we are doing in the next tasks. we spelled Clarence wrong in the credits. also Joe cut his head so there was a continuity error. it was good for us to do this task because it gives us a rough outline of what to expect on this course. it flowed well but it went well considering none of us knew how to work the camera and none of us had ever done it before. we should have taken the poster down in the background so it looked better. In the ending credits it was good as we put our initials and that made it flow well. overall it was good start to the course.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)